Free · no account · nothing stored
A peptide reference you can calculate with
CalcMyPeptide is the desk Kymata Labs built for reconstitution math, compound lookup, stack maps, protocols, and long-form writing. The calculators are the sharp end. The library, stacks, and articles are why the tab stays open. We do not sell peptides, book consults, or wear a white coat we did not earn.
What ships
Live inventoryThe desk, not a single tool
People land here for a draw number. They stay because the number sits next to the compound, the stack, and the article that explains the assumption. Six modules cover reconstitution, multi-peptide blends, reverse water volume, GLP-1 escalation, vial duration, and half-life decay. All of that math runs in the browser. Refresh the tab and it is gone.
A library, then an encyclopedia
174 research peptides. Each leaf has half-life, typical range, mechanism notes, and citations. The encyclopedia is the same catalog in alphabetical order, built for people who already know the name. The Khavinson wing maps 41 canonical bioregulators by organ and class, citing published papers and public Cytomed maps. We do not paste paid courses.
Combinations, in three rooms
Stacks are not one page with a cute name. The blend calculator does multi-peptide math in a single syringe. Goal protocols group compounds by job: recovery, metabolic health, longevity, cognition, and adjacent series. Khavinson stacks follow organ pairings from public manufacturer maps, 14 of them. Named combinations in the writing (GLOW, Wolverine, CJC/ipamorelin, and the rest) point back to the math, not the other way around.
None of that is a prescription. A stack on this site is a map you can inspect, not a protocol we are running on you.
Writing that has to survive the calculator
149articles and two pillar guides. Reconstitution from first principles. GLP-1 escalation with published steps. Storage, purity literacy, syringe units, named stacks, and the myths that keep circulating. If a sentence cannot sit next to a formula, it does not belong here. Animal data is called animal data. Advisory ranges are called advisory. The BPC-157 "4-hour half-life" lore is flagged as lore.
Every calculator, every peptide page, every article. No account, no paywall, no email wall.
Calculator input never leaves the browser. We do not log draws, doses, or vial sizes. Refresh, and the session is gone.
Library and Khavinson pages carry sources. Machine-readable inventory lives on the AI page for crawlers that prefer files to scraping.
Evidence labeled as it is. If we do not have a human PK number, we do not invent one so the page looks finished.
How we grade evidence
Not every PubMed hit is the same kind of fact. A number on this site is supposed to say where it came from. We do not treat supplier pages, Discord screenshots, or influencer dosing calendars as evidence.
| Ceiling | What it is | How we use it |
|---|---|---|
| Human RCT / approved label | Phase 3 or an FDA (or EMA) indication | Max score 9. The only place efficacy percents belong without a hedge. |
| Phase 2–3, not yet labeled | Controlled human data, incomplete regulatory story | Max 8. Do not launder onto a research-chem cake. |
| Small human / Phase 1 | PK, safety, or tiny open-label | Max 6.5. Useful for half-life. Not a protocol. |
| Multi-lab animal, consistent | Independent groups, same direction | Max 5.5. Still not a human indication. |
| Single-lab or community | One school’s file, or forum convention | Max 4. Labeled as such. BPC-157 lives here more than people want. |
| Mechanism / in vitro | Receptor, microarray, cell culture | 1–2.5. Explains a story. Does not dose a syringe. |
Community reconstitution math can still be shown. It gets called community math. Vendor blends (GLOW, KLOW, Wolverine) do not inherit a combination trial they do not have. Empty FAQ beats an invented one. Empty PMID beats a decorative one.
How a page gets written
A compound leaf starts with identity: sequence, CAS when we have it, what the SKU actually is versus the parent protein or the brand drug. Then the literature search. Then the reconstitution arithmetic from the vial sizes we list. Then a pass that asks whether any sentence would embarrass us next to a calculator.
Drafting uses AI tools. That is worth saying in a health-adjacent library instead of hiding it. Source choice, evidence ceilings, dosing numbers, and the decision to cut a claim are editorial. The studio owns the page. AI does not get to mint a PMID, a half-life, or a “synergy” grade.
Last reviewed dates are real review dates, not a stylesheet. Current content stamp: 2026-08-31. When a paper, a Category 2 note, or a WADA list changes the file, the leaf should move.
Reconstitution math, in public
Every draw table is the same three identities. We show them so you can catch us.
concentration (mg/mL) = vial_mg ÷ water_mL dose volume (mL) = target_mg ÷ concentration U-100 units = dose volume (mL) × 100
Multi-peptide cakes use the same identities per component, then add volumes. If a GLOW or KLOW page prints 10 units from a 70 mg cake, that is arithmetic of an advertised split, not a prescription. The how-it-works page is the formula sheet. The reconstitution and blend calculators are the same math with inputs.
What we are not
There is no medical board here, and we will not invent one. Nothing on this site is medical advice, a prescription, a diagnosis, or an endorsement of any compound. Peptides may be prescription-only or restricted where you live. Talk to a licensed professional before injecting, swallowing, or stacking anything.
We do not run clinical trials. We do not assay vials. When a COA is mentioned, that is your document, not a CalcMyPeptide lab. We do not claim a compound is safe or effective for a purpose the literature does not support. We do not sell peptides, book consults, or wear a white coat we did not earn. Affiliate links, when they exist, do not get to rewrite a half-life or a WADA class.
Full legal copy lives on the disclaimer.
Who builds this
CalcMyPeptide is a Kymata Labs property, launched March 2026. If a dosing table, a reconstitution example, or a citation is wrong, write contact@kymatalabs.com with the URL and the primary source. Typical reply is 24–48 business hours. Accuracy is the job. We would rather patch a leaf than defend a pretty number.